![]() If you're running a hospital you don't see software as one of the major parts of your business, but increasingly it is. "And ironically it's the government institutions that don't have the resources because they don't see software as a primary part of their business. "One of the things we tend to see is that government organisations tend to have software a little bit behind what's the latest in the market," he said. Mr Sammartino says often it is government or government-run organisations - such as hospitals in the UK - that are most vulnerable. If there is an attack they haven't got time to patch them and upgrade. "What that means is if there are vulnerabilities and they get out there in the market, there's a higher chance that the organisations using it don't have the resources to keep their software up-to-date. It hasn't been supported by Microsoft in more than three years," he told the ABC. "XP Windows software that was at the centre of the WannaCry attack is a 10-year-old piece of software. "We see in places, for example in China, a lot of people are using older operating systems that may not have patches available and so they may be more harder hit."Īustralian technologist Steve Sammartino said the WannaCry ransomware appears to have targeted XP Windows software that is no longer supported by Microsoft. "We've seen it all over the world, the top countries affected are places like China for example, Brazil, the US, Russia, these places that have been affected primarily has to do with where there's big computing infrastructure," Mr Chien said. Technical experts say those organisations with out-of-date software appear to have been most vulnerable, explaining perhaps why so many developing countries have been badly hit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |